The Supreme Court has undermined US democracy - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
2024年美国总统大选

The Supreme Court has undermined US democracy

Expanding presidential immunity increases the risks from a second Trump term
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":8.81,"text":"Just a few weeks ago, a Manhattan jury found former president Donald Trump guilty of 34 felony counts. "},{"start":15.289000000000001,"text":"Its decision affirmed an idea that is the bedrock of American democracy: no one, not even a former president, is above the law. "},{"start":22.756999999999998,"text":"Monday’s Supreme Court decision in Trump vs United States seems to undercut that principle. "}],[{"start":28.759999999999998,"text":"In a 6-3 decision regarding Trump’s claims of immunity over allegations that he sought to overturn the 2020 election result, the court radically expanded the notion of presidential immunity. "},{"start":38.888999999999996,"text":"It argued that a president may not be criminally prosecuted for exercising “core constitutional” duties, such as commanding the military, and has “presumptive immunity” for “official” acts. "}],[{"start":48.69,"text":"The majority opinion, penned by Chief Justice John Roberts, suggests “official” could apply to anything a president does with the agencies under their jurisdiction. "},{"start":57.107,"text":"A president, it states, has no immunity for “unofficial” acts. "}],[{"start":61.989999999999995,"text":"Lower courts will now have to draw the boundaries between what were official and unofficial acts. "},{"start":66.794,"text":"The Supreme Court ruling almost certainly pushes any trial over the election interference case beyond the November election. "},{"start":73.062,"text":"Voters are then deprived of knowing the outcome, and Trump could throw the case out if re-elected. "},{"start":78.154,"text":"The court has also forever altered the US system — in a way that not only a returning Trump but other future presidents could take advantage of. "}],[{"start":86.25999999999999,"text":"In another era, this decision might be seen as less a dangerous harbinger, and more a subject for high-flown debates. "},{"start":93.08899999999998,"text":"Ever since the 1982 Nixon vs Fitzgerald case, the court has been clear that a president is immune from civil liability for actions taken in office. "},{"start":101.41899999999998,"text":"The court has now extended that principle, arguing that an “energetic, independent” executive should not be deterred from taking necessary action by concerns over potential criminal prosecution after leaving office. "}],[{"start":113.24,"text":"Criminal conduct seemed unlikely for most past presidents, who, despite their failings, generally sought to occupy the “place of moral leadership” that Franklin Delano Roosevelt argued is the core of the role. "},{"start":124.282,"text":"But we have now observed the extent to which an occupant of the White House can erode democratic norms. "},{"start":129.387,"text":"Trump’s first term, despite some limited economic successes, was characterised by a disregard for the rule of law and the electoral system, as evidenced by two impeachment trials and the sundry criminal cases against him and his former staff. "}],[{"start":142.89,"text":"A second term promises to be even more incendiary. "},{"start":146.307,"text":"Trump has vowed to be a “dictator” in his first day in office, and has all but promised to wield the immense powers of the office to punish his political enemies. "},{"start":153.999,"text":"In expanding presidential immunity, the Supreme Court has in effect granted Trump — and all future presidents — carte blanche. "}],[{"start":161.82999999999998,"text":"With courts now unable to hold a president accountable for most actions taken in office, the ruling shunts that responsibility on to the Senate and the House of Representatives. "},{"start":170.509,"text":"But as Trump’s failed impeachments show, the current polarised US legislature has proved particularly ill-equipped to restrain a demagogue. "}],[{"start":178.76,"text":"Trump may lose in November, and a lower court may still find him liable for “unofficial” acts related to his attempts to overturn the election. "},{"start":186.177,"text":"But the Supreme Court’s decision has done lasting damage. "},{"start":189.369,"text":"The American Revolution — which Ralph Waldo Emerson called “the shot heard round the world” — helped spur an international movement away from tyranny and towards democracy and accountability. "},{"start":198.524,"text":"By prioritising an “energetic” presidency over an accountable one, the court’s conservative justices have chipped away at a central pillar of the American system. "}],[{"start":206.54,"text":""}]],"url":"https://creatives.ftacademy.cn/album/161497-1719977168.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

一周新闻小测:2025年3月2日

您对本周的全球重大新闻了解如何?来做个小测试吧!

乌克兰的双重痛苦:普京和现在的特朗普

在没有美国支持的情况下,这个国家是否还能继续战斗?亚历克•罗素从基辅发回报道,讲述这个被围困的国家所承受的压力。

大型科技公司与AI新世界秩序的起源

硅谷应该为军队服务吗?技术战争意味着什么?人工智能的非人道速度会超过监管机构吗?三本书展望快速发展的未来。

反疫苗运动的政治崛起

随着传统政党的衰落,疫苗怀疑论已成为填补真空的反建制力量之一。

为什么美国仍在气候危险区建造房屋?

开发商正在高风险地区进行更多建设,这表明在适应极端天气的同时,还需应对住房短缺的双重挑战。

在特朗普封堵贸易漏洞后,中国小型出口商寻找B计划

为数千家企业提供重要生命线的税收豁免即将取消。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×