EU carmakers’ strategic U-turns point them in the right direction - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

EU carmakers’ strategic U-turns point them in the right direction

The wheels have not come off the electronic vehicle market entirely

When periods of exuberance come to a close, ideas that once seemed to make a lot of sense no longer do. So it is in the European car industry. Slowing growth of electric vehicle sales has caused a series of corporate U-turns. While sharp swerves are never fun, the change in direction is sensible.

A decision by Volvo Cars on Thursday to cut loose its premium EV brand Polestar is the latest example of a strategic about-turn. Earlier this week, Renault axed plans to float its EV unit Ampere. A mooted initial public offering of Volkswagen’s battery unit, meanwhile, also looks some way off.

The wheels have not come off the EV market entirely. Sales growth in Europe is expected to come in at about 5 per cent in 2024 — a sharp slowdown from 2023’s 14 per cent growth, but hardly a crash. The market had simply overestimated the pace of change.

EU carmakers, traditionally plagued with vast conglomerate discounts, aimed to attract sky high valuations for their EV arms. The hope was to achieve those enjoyed by Tesla, which trades at more than 58 times forward earnings, and Vietnam’s VinFast. Now that the market’s enthusiasm has waned — shares in VinFast are down 85 per cent over the past six months — “unlocking value” through corporate action looks less attractive.   

The strategic rationale for EV listings was always tenuous. Polestar, with sizeable investment needs and operationally reliant on Volvo and its Chinese parent Geely, was not an obvious candidate for a standalone equity story when it listed in 2022. Worse, Volvo retained 48 per cent. With the Swedish carmaker facing big EV-related capex needs of its own, a spin-off that hands Polestar to its ultimate shareholder Geely looks like a better plan. Volvo’s stock rose by about a quarter on Thursday. 

At Renault, too, shareholders welcomed the decision to keep Ampere within the fold. Lex has argued that EVs will be a key pillar of the group’s value creation in future. But given Renault does not need capital to fund its transition, it is right to hold on to Ampere for the time being.

The slowing pace of EV adoption is good news for traditional European automakers, which have been slow to transition. Stellantis, which has taken a particularly cautious approach, has outperformed Tesla in the past 12 months. If the EV revolution takes longer to materialise legacy automakers should have more time to align themselves with their EV-focused peers.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

新西兰自诩为“安全港湾”,投资者纷至沓来

现任领导人拉克森希望在阿德恩时代之后,让新西兰在国际舞台上占有一席之地。

如果美国政府关门会发生什么?

美国国会的更多争吵引发了对再次发生联邦拨款危机的担忧。

Lex专栏:北伏破产表明欧洲应坚持做自己擅长的事

欧洲培育本土电池制造商并削弱亚洲对手主导地位的希望已经破灭。

“我们必须重建我们的国家”:特朗普及其团队寻求经济休克疗法

美国总统的官员坚定地推进着他们重塑这个世界最大经济体的战略。

俄罗斯不是赚钱的地方

里巴科娃:美国企业不应认为,美俄关系解冻会让它们更容易在俄罗斯开展业务。

Lex专栏:索尼和任天堂应采取长期策略应对特朗普关税

尽管索尼和任天堂的股票近期遭到抛售,但游戏产业的整体前景依然强劲。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×